CO129-557-12 Armstrong and Turner v. Estate Duty Commissioner- appeal to Privy Council 18-5-1936 - 2-10-1936 — Page 21

53689/36

And the

DRAFT. See ninetes.

Covernor

Нонд Конд.

JKL

Coded fent 3 P

ho 122

2818736

a

21 AUG

28

22

Armstrong v. Estate Ducts Commenigen,

(1) Your desp. 315 CHATER appeal.

Board of

Indand Revenue

nisuch cases

practice foto is as it is

lobe

stated fin passage quoted

from DYMOND in paras

They point out however

(a)

that Hong Kong ayed they ar

FURTHER ACTION.

working under different statutes which Hong Kong card longlish laws

may justify different practices;

by that

wnation statute to Crushing,

no

will be withe

conal, I will

to W what the

least unpressed by being soft

Board Nuland Reveune practice is ©

of that

U practice, whatever

clatantes it is in bipatingo

Please telegraph

what

mishuctions